Kasese
District Civil Society Organizations, supported by the European Union adopted
the RWECO- Kasese District Budget Analysis 2012 as a position paper that was presented to the Kasese District budget Conference held on Friday 21, December 2012 at Diocese of Kasese, SSD-Hall, Kasese Municipality.
A presentation was made by Ms. Sheila K, a staff from
RWECO with the support of the four Civil Society supported by European Union: FURA, Rwenzori Peace Bridge, KADNET and Red
Cross on locating the vulnerable in Kasese district Budget and Plan as
discussed on 19/12/2012 during a round table meeting. The chair of the session
was the Chairperson LC V, Kasese district, Lt Col (Rtd) Dula Mawa Muhindo
(File Photo) Lt.Col. (Rtd) Dula Mawa Muhindo, Kasese District LCV Chairperson |
Reaction
from the District Leaders all started with a phrase thank you for opening
our eyes and the budget analysis was used as a reference for prioritizing
activities for the financial year 2013/2014. Councilors used the information in
the budget analysis to advocate for among others:
i)
budget
allocation to the water sector that was under funded,
Business in Mawa Market, Kasese Municipality: Matooke is mainly imported from neighboring districts |
ii)
Distribution of water according to the zoning,
iii)
Specific mention and consideration for the vulnerable
in the NAADs
iv)
Improved production in agriculture by adding value to
agriculture through modern technologies.
One
counselor asked “Why does Kasese donate money by buying Matooke after learning that
annually over Ugx. 0.5bn as given in the
Mawa market case in the Budget
Analysis. The chairperson LC5 was
concerned about the need to increase local revenue in the district so as to
become self reliant instead of depending on central government transfer. It was
agreed that the technical planning committees should involve the CSOs in the
planning as well as consider their budget in planning. Another gratifying
experience was the Education Department that has acknowledged RWECO as development partner in
the district and allocated it a revenue projection of UGX 1000/=. This was
interesting as most departments only recognized the international donors. The
findings by the monitors were reacted on by the counselors referring to our
report like Karusandara Health centre that had no latrine
Bravo
to all the members of the CSO for the support as well as positioning ourselves
well. See details: http://www.kasese.go.ug/administration/index.htm
, http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rweco&oq=rweco&gs_l=youtube.12...0.0.0.1299.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0...1ac.
,
In summary
the Kasese district Budget Analysis revealed the following:
• Locally
raised revenue is only 1.95% of the total budget of Ugx. 41,683,630.
• Donor
funding takes only 12.3%
• Local
development grant is only 2.8%
• Government
transfers is only 82.9%
• This
indicates a high dependency on government transfers.
• There is
need to explore other local revenue sources – such as the informal sector (e.g
Artisans)
• Education
takes 48.2% of the total Kasese District budget
while Kamwenge is 37.2%, Kabarole 47%, National 17%
• Health takes
9.9% (Kamwenge 9.07%, National 11%)
• Water takes
0.17%
• Production
takes 8.1% (Kabarole 9%, National 5%)
Case of the Production Sector:
• Total budget
for production sector = 3,382,200,000/
• Its takes
only 8.1% of the total Kasese LG budget
• NAADS =
79.2% of the production budget.
• Let us pose
a question; if the 79.2% will translate into improved productivity
• By
observation, at least more than 3 trucks bring in matooke to Mawa Market from
outside Kasese district;
• A bunch of
matooke of 50Kg costs Ugx. 20,000=
• Over 500
bunches are sold= 500 x 20,000 = 10,000,000 weekly x 4 x12 = 480,000,000million
• This is what
Kasese district residents donate to the middle men every year.
• Yet we spend
79.2% of the production budget on NAADs and still depend on imported matooke- where is the value for money spent?
• This 480million
could have been revenue for Kasese district if we were able to produce our own
food, however that is revenue for out side districts.
• That means
Kasese district can not produce enough for its own population
• Window of
hope, the district has redirected the NAADs priorities after realizing that
Kasese district was food insecure.
• From the
records, the PWDs are reflected in the NAADs sector
• Inclusive
groups have not helped to bring out the plight of the vulnerable groups
• Need to
locate the vulnerable groups in the LG processes- PWDs, women, youths ( FY
2013/14)
• Sensitizing
staff to handle children with hearing/vision impairment- health workers
• Inspire
young girls/women to take up leadership positions ( only 61/365) by role
models/senior civil servants
• CBS take
advantage of the NGOs/CBOs in the district to meet its sector objectives
• NGOs/CBOs
participate in the LG process right from the LCI- district level ( FY 2013/14)
• During the
planning process, district should take cognizant of the geographical zones-
Highlands, low lands, pastoral and salt/lake areas
• Water sector
take affirmative action for PWDs by planning for water harvesting tanks
• Need for
affirmative action in the NAADs sector- PWDs
Merry Christmas To all.
Sheila K
RWECO
RWECO